One criticism about my book FREEDOM CLUB is about its alternate history flashbacks, and the fact that diverging from the primary plot makes the book more difficult to read. I suppose this is true to some limited extent. However, I also feel that readers have become overly accustomed to the homogenized story-telling techniques employed by big publishers. I’m not saying I don’t like a good thriller now and then. But for some reason it seems wrong to enforce preconditions on how one must write a book. Is this not art?
Now some people will say that intellectual issues within a book are fine if treated the right way. The ‘right’ way? Sadly, I translate this as a prerequisite to couch all text in nail-biting action which keeps readers glued to each line of text. Fine for thrillers; but not every book needs to be a thriller, right?
In any event, to help readers try to understand my non-standard flashbacks, I’ve put together a ‘reader’s guide’. You can see it from the blog’s main menu, and I hope it helps extract greater meaning from the flashbacks, so that they don’t feel like they are just roadblocks.
It was always my goal to make a book that would entice people to think. How interesting to see that when you actually do this, you pay a price.
And to those who say all higher learning can be fun: sorry, I must disagree. Intellectual pursuits can be extremely enjoyable, but they’re not fun. Look at any serious artist painting, writing, making music, sculpting…. Are they skipping around and going WEEEEEEE ? I don’t think so. Normally, they’ve got on some hard face and look like they’re zoned out (or want to kill someone). For sure, they are enjoying themselves.
But that’s not the same as having fun.
Not on sale until October, but thought I would share this anyway. My publisher, Hotspur Publishing, made this cool promo video. Enjoy!
Posted in Philosophy, Sci-Fi, Science Fiction, SciFi, Speculative Fiction, Writing
Tagged book, Book review, book reviews, books, philosophy, publishing, Sci-Fi, science fiction, Technology, Writing
Even though central to my book’s theme in some respects, I only recently familiarized myself with Retrocausality. An interesting concept which boils down to this: effect before cause.
So is it real? I believe it’s more interesting as a philosophical topic. Certainly, we at times imagine our actions are based on the influence or desires of others in the future. No? Then just imagine someone who bucks society, and then defiantly slams a fist on the table. “I’m right god-damn-it ! You’ll see, time will tell!”
So…, taking actions now in the name of future morality (the cause) is employed. It’s not so strange for the human animal. Even if it’s wrong, it certainly is poetic. Isn’t that enough to give pause to this absurd notion?
Anyway, I suppose time will tell if it’s right or wrong. Time will tell.
Is this a hot topic or what? I came across this topic recently. After which, I searched on Wikipedia and found a page that claims that Libertarian Science Fiction is a legitimate subgenre of Science Fiction.
I recall starting discussion on LinkedIn sometime back asking how many sub-genres exist in SF. A small war broke out with lots of opinions in every direction. Of course there is no official gatekeeper, but throughout the discussion I never saw any mention of Libertarian Science Fiction.
The Wiki article mentioned Robert A. Heinlein‘s The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress as a good example in support. Clearly, there are elements of truth to this assessment. However, I would want to see a very long list of books (with their author’s approval ) that demonstrate this sub-genre is really out there. Otherwise, I would just chalk up SF as a genre that leans towards this philosophy because… well, it’s interesting.
Comments are welcome. But please! Let’s not have any war over this, it’s not worth it.
Posted in Philosophy, Sci-Fi, Science Fiction, Speculative Fiction
Tagged books, genre, Libertarianism, Libratarian, philosophy, Robert Heinlein, Sci-Fi, Science, science fiction, subgenre, Technology
The following paper is probably the best document which describes the death of “Good Old Fashion AI”.
Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian
Okay, it might be a bit long for the casual blog readers. But Professor Dryfus makes a compelling case for the death of traditional AI, and why its future depends on Heideggerian philosophy. In reality, the AI community now seems to recognise that to crack the secret of consciousness, we must first understand how it manifests itself in living creatures. Only then can we begin to create artificial intelligence that represents that which we can only now imagine in Science Fiction.
It’s a fascinating topic.
Posted in Philosophy, Sci-Fi, Science, Science Fiction, Uncategorized
Tagged brain, brain science podcast, Heidegger, Panksepp, philosophy, Sci-Fi, Science, science fiction, Technology
Has anyone read Bug Jack Barron lately? It was one of the great “New Wave” SF novels written in the late 60’s by Norman Spinrad. And in my opinion, it has one of the best opening chapters I’ve ever read. Perhaps it wasn’t trying to be funny, but I nearly fell off my chair as I turned the pages.
Trying to peer into the near future (20 or 30 years from Spinrad’s point of view), the book does an amazing job guessing how important the media would become by the end of the millenia. Digital democracy is painfully envisioned, and reminds one of almost any talk-show we see today. I would even venture to say that Jack Barron (the main character) is comparable to a modern-day Jon Stewart. But if you don’t think so, pick some other TV personality. There are lots to choose
Now, this book might not be considered politically correct, as it employs a lot of 60’s language now deemed offensive. But even so, I believe its message is meaningful in today’s world. This is a great book. It deserves our attention, and one’s deep respect.
Posted in Sci-Fi, Science Fiction, Speculative Fiction
Tagged book, Book review, book reviews, books, Hugo Awards, philosophy, Sci-Fi, Science, science fiction, speculative-fiction, Technology, Worldcon
I’m currently reading Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner, and I’m quite impressed. In my opinion they don’t make Science Fiction like this anymore. Publishers would reject this kind of avant-garde writing straight out. Why? Well, if one were to follow all the pedantic rules editors blindly follow these days, it breaks them all. And I mean all of them!
But that is exactly why I love this book. It’s true science fiction, and tries to portray a world gone haywire with overpopulation. Of course no one is up in arms over such a topic these days, but one has to awed by Brunner’s attempt to challenge and edify the readers of his time.
Posted in Sci-Fi, Science Fiction, Speculative Fiction
Tagged book, Book review, book reviews, books, Deathworld, Hugo Awards, philosophy, publishing, Sci-Fi, Science, science fiction, speculative fiction, Technology, Worldcon, Writing
Jacques Ellul was a 20th century French philosopher. He wrote several books, and some were about technological and its impact on society. Perhaps the most important of these was “The Technological Society” (see recommended reading list). Ted Kaczynski (also known as “The Unabomber”) often quotes from Ellul, and even though this might be considered a poor choice of reference, I do believe it highlights the fact that Ellul’s work has far-reaching implications and influence.
The following You Tube video is a short 6 part documentary produced by Jan van Boeckel. “The Betrayal by Technology” is a fascinating view into the thoughts of Ellul made before some time before his death in 1994. It is all in French, but does have English subtitles.
Please watch the entire documentrary at this link and feel free to leave comments. I think Ellul makes so many interesting points, it is sure to stimulate discussion on many levels.
Note: The above quote comes from Kaczynski’s book; Technological Slavery: The Collected Writings of Theodore J. Kaczynski, A.k.a. “The Unabomber”